Intellectual Property
Better IP execution. Less production drag.
Claim charts, construction support, prior art, expert prep, PTAB watch, scheduling orders, and party correspondence stay attached to the same matter. Specialists prepare review-ready output. Attorneys approve.
District-court litigation, PTAB proceedings, expert coordination, and prosecution work often run in parallel. FlowCounsel keeps those workstreams connected inside the matter instead of scattering them across patent platforms, chat workspaces, and drafting add-ins.
Patent lifecycle
One matter record across litigation, PTAB, and expert work.
Preview
Docket extraction
Scheduling orders become structured deadlines
Upload the scheduling order. The Docket Specialist extracts every date and ties them to the matter timeline.
Claim work, docket, experts, and approvals connected in one IP system.
The IP matter, end to end
One system for claim work, docket, experts, and approvals.
IP firms do not need one tool for claim charts, another for docket, another for experts, another for prior art. The matter is the operating surface.
Matter intake
Conflict checks, party graph (clients, opposing, experts, counsel), and practice-lane assignment open the matter without re-entry.
Lifecycle tracking
Complaint, fact discovery, claim construction, expert discovery, PTAB, and trial stages render automatically as work progresses.
Specialist execution
Claim Construction Support, Prior Art, Docket, PTAB Monitoring, and Expert Prep specialists stage review-ready output inside the matter.
Communications routing
Inbound email tags to matter and lane (Counsel, Court/PTAB, Expert, Client, Internal) before specialist drafting begins.
Approved work attached
Approved documents, revisions, and review decisions stay connected to the matter and accessible to the firm.
Specialists for IP
IP specialist coverage across the full matter lifecycle.
The live IP execution model spans intake, claim work, expert prep, docket, PTAB coordination, and resolution. Core specialists carry across every practice area. IP specialists overlay on top.
Core Specialists · Shared foundation
Reusable across every practice area.
Intake Specialist
Matter opening, intake capture, engagement setup, initial routing
Communications Specialist
Inbound routing, lane tagging, draft support
Records / Evidence Specialist
Source collection, exhibit organization, citation tracking
Discovery Specialist
Discovery package support, response organization, production prep
Deadline / Docket Monitoring
Scheduling order extraction, deadline tracking, procedural watch
Resolution Specialist
Settlement, judgment, post-trial workflow
Closure Specialist
Final documents, archival handoff, file checklist
IP Specialists
Patent-side overlay on the Core foundation.
Claim Chart Specialist
Claim-to-product mapping, infringement and invalidity charts
Claim Construction Support
Disputed terms, intrinsic record, construction positions, Markman support
Prior Art Specialist
Reference collection, invalidity contentions, IPR support
PTAB / Docket Coordination
Proceeding updates, deadline watch, parallel coordination
Expert Prep / Technical Summary
Infringement narratives, technical exhibits, deposition prep
Patent Drafting
Application drafts from invention disclosure, claim trees, specifications
Office Action Response
Examiner response prep, amendment drafting
Patent Portfolio
Family tracking, maintenance reminders, freedom-to-operate analysis
Claim construction support
Disputed terms compiled inside the matter, not assembled across tools.
Intrinsic record cites, opposing proposals, prior construction history, and exhibits get assembled into one reviewable packet so the attorney works from organized work product.
That is the IP execution model: the matter holds the briefing context, the specialist stages the construction packet, and the attorney approves what moves forward.
Claim construction support
Disputed terms compiled inside the matter, not assembled across tools.
Docket specialist
Scheduling orders become a structured matter timeline.
Upload the scheduling order. The Docket Specialist reads it, extracts every deadline and milestone, and writes them into the matter timeline tied to the right phase.
Parallel proceedings (district court + PTAB) cross-reference automatically so deadline conflicts surface for review instead of being discovered late.
Docket specialist
Scheduling orders become a structured matter timeline.
The firm record
Approved work and firm preferences live with the matter, not in a separate tool.
IP firms accumulate institutional knowledge — preferred construction framings, citation styles, PTAB posture, and jurisdictional defaults. FlowCounsel keeps that knowledge attached to the matters it produced, so the next matter starts from the firm’s own approved work, not from a generic template.
Firm profile
Practice lanes, defaults, and explicit instructions.
Practice-area lanes, preferred citation styles, jurisdictional defaults, and firm-specific instructions configured once and applied to every matter.
Approved work product
Every approved document, in one searchable index.
Approved claim charts, prior-art memos, invalidity contentions, PTAB summaries, and discovery packets stay attached to the matters that produced them and remain accessible to the firm as reference.
Review history
Edits and approvals stay tied to the work.
Every revision and approval decision stays attached to the matter and document, so the firm can see what changed, who approved it, and why.
Built so firm knowledge stays with the firm, not the tool vendor.
The loop
Matter opens. Specialists draft. Attorneys approve. The next matter opens with context.
This is the IP wedge. Claim work, expert prep, docket, PTAB coordination, communications, and review stay connected inside one operating record instead of starting from zero on every matter.
Step 1
Matter opens
Party graph, scheduling order, opposing counsel, and witnesses load with the matter without re-entry.
Step 2
Specialists execute
Claim Construction Support, Prior Art, Docket, PTAB Monitoring, and Expert Prep stage review-ready packets inside the matter.
Step 3
Attorney reviews and approves
Nothing moves without review. Edits, approvals, and revision history stay attached to the record.
Step 4
Work stays connected
Approved documents, communications, deadlines, and party context remain searchable inside the firm’s own system.
Step 5
The next matter opens with context
When a related matter opens, the firm’s prior approved work and preferences are available as reference, not buried in another tool.
A different category
The IP question is not which AI can analyze a patent.
Legal AI for IP comes in three shapes: patent platforms focused on the patent corpus, chat and document tools that draft inside Word or a workspace, and add-ins that learn from prior applications. None of them run the matter.
Patent platforms, chat, and add-ins
Useful for the document. Disconnected from the matter.
Matter-native execution
The IP matter is the operating record.
Intellectual Property
Better claim work. Less production drag.
Connect claim work, docket, experts, PTAB coordination, and approved firm patterns in one matter-native system.