Specialists
Specialists named for what they do.
FlowCounsel specialists are named for the work they prepare. Concrete inputs, visible state, and a review gate before any external effect.
The specialist constellation
Function-named jobs. One shared review boundary.
Records Specialist
24 records · 4 providers
The specialist contract
You can audit a function. You cannot audit a vibe.
A friendly assistant in a chat tab is a vibe. A function-named specialist with bounded inputs, visible state, and a review gate is a job a firm can inspect, govern, and sign off on.
A vibe to talk to
An AI persona with a disclaimer.
A general assistant in a chat tab. No named job, no inputs, no states. The disclaimer carries the risk.
Assistant
Generic legal AI · always on
A bounded job, grounded and reviewed
A function-named specialist.
Bounded inputs, assembled context, source provenance, visible state, and a review gate before any external effect.
Records Specialist
Pulls medical records · stages chronology
Taxonomy
A small, named set. Reused across the firm.
A shared foundation reused across every practice area, a Growth set on the acquisition side, and practice overlays where the lane gets specific.
Shared foundation
Reusable across every practice area.
Growth specialists
Acquisition and pipeline.
Practice overlays
Lane-specific specialists with deeper proof on the practice pages.
Communications Specialist
Draft assistance is only useful when the message lands back in the record.
A point tool can help write an email. FlowCounsel treats communications as part of the matter: source, context, draft, review, approval, send state, and follow-up stay attached.
Inbox assistance, tied back to the matter file.
FlowCounsel should include the email assistance firms expect: summaries, reply drafts, tone controls, templates, and context-aware wording. The difference is that the message does not remain a loose draft in an inbox. It becomes a governed record with source, linkage, review state, and follow-up history.
Matter communication
Lindgren v. Doe · Client update request
Inbound email
Client question, provider response, carrier update, opposing counsel message.
Matter context
Parties, posture, deadlines, documents, prior thread, approved firm patterns.
Draft assistance
Summary, suggested reply, tone adjustment, missing-fact request, template fit.
Draft staged
Subject: Update on records request
We received the provider response and are reviewing the records against the current chronology. I will update you after attorney review confirms whether anything else is needed.
Ingested
Message captured as source material.
Linked
Matched to matter, party, task, or deadline.
Drafted
To, subject, and body staged for review.
Approved
Attorney edits or approves before send.
Review boundary
Drafted, pending, edited, approved, external effect.
Every specialist runs through the same five states. Approval is system state, not policy. Specialists cannot skip the gate and lineage stays attached to the case.
Review boundary · system state
No external effect without attorney approval.
Drafted
Pending
Edited
Approved
External effect
Drafted
Specialist stages work product. No external effect.
Examples gated by review
Lineage preserved
Every state change is captured. Who drafted, who edited, who approved, when each transition happened, and what the work looked like at every step.
Built into the workflow, not a disclaimer.
Approval is system state. Specialists cannot skip it. Lineage stays attached.
Approved work compounds
Drafting patterns, examiner response patterns, prior-art reuse.
Every approved demand, OA response, claim chart, and prior-art memo your firm signs off on can inform later specialist runs through firm-scoped, reviewable patterns. Your firm only. Never blended across the platform.
Approved work informs the next draft
Your firm only. Never blended across the platform.
Approved work · last 90d
Available to the next specialist run
Engagement letter patterns
Tone, structure, and signoff your firm has approved across new matters.
Examiner response patterns
What worked with this examiner across your prior cases.
Prior-art reuse
Validated invalidity grounds available to the next case.
Demand framing patterns
Damages framing your firm has settled on across PI cases.
Firm-scoped
Reuse stays inside your firm. No cross-firm blending.
Approval-gated
Only attorney-approved work and reviewed patterns inform future drafts.
Lineage attached
Each pattern traces back to the case that produced it.
Where specialists run
See specialists in their lane.
Growth and Matters share the foundation. Plaintiff PI and IP add lane-specific specialists with deeper proof on the practice pages.
GROWTH
Discoverability, intake, pipeline.
Digital Receptionist, Intake, Pipeline, and Performance run on the demand side of the firm system.
OpenMATTERS
Casework execution.
Records, Communications, Discovery, Resolution, and Closure run on the case side. The same review boundary applies.
OpenPLAINTIFF PERSONAL INJURY
PI specialists, end to end.
Records, demand, lien work, settlement, and closeout. Concrete proof on the practice page.
OpenINTELLECTUAL PROPERTY
Prosecution, OA response, claim charting, docket.
Application drafting, office action response, claim charts, and docket work for plaintiff IP firms.
OpenSpecialists prepare. Attorneys approve.
Function-named jobs with concrete inputs, visible state, and a review gate before any external effect.